What is the effect of designing risk out during the risk response process?

What is the effect of designing risk out during the risk response process?

• A. It transfers risk to a different party
• B. It completely eliminates the risk from the system
• C. It reduces the likelihood of risk occurring
• D. It accepts the risk without taking further action

Answer: (B)

Designing risk out during the risk response process fundamentally involves taking proactive measures to eliminate potential risks entirely from a project or system. This approach is rooted in the belief that if a risk can be eliminated through careful planning, design changes, or other strategic adaptations, it should be addressed at the earliest possible stage. When risks are designed out, the focus is on altering processes, features, or components that introduce those risks in the first place, thereby preventing them from having any chance to materialize. This might involve using alternative materials to avoid safety hazards or implementing different workflows that eliminate risky dependencies. In contrast, options such as transferring risk merely shift the responsibility for the risk to another party, and accepting risk means acknowledging its presence without taking steps to prevent it. Reducing likelihood does aim to lessen the chance of risk occurring but does not guarantee its complete eradication as designing it out does. Therefore, the effect of designing risk out is that it results in a total elimination of the risk from the project or system.

Designing risk out during the risk response process fundamentally involves taking proactive measures to eliminate potential risks entirely from a project or system. This approach is rooted in the belief that if a risk can be eliminated through careful planning, design changes, or other strategic adaptations, it should be addressed at the earliest possible stage.

When risks are designed out, the focus is on altering processes, features, or components that introduce those risks in the first place, thereby preventing them from having any chance to materialize. This might involve using alternative materials to avoid safety hazards or implementing different workflows that eliminate risky dependencies.

In contrast, options such as transferring risk merely shift the responsibility for the risk to another party, and accepting risk means acknowledging its presence without taking steps to prevent it. Reducing likelihood does aim to lessen the chance of risk occurring but does not guarantee its complete eradication as designing it out does. Therefore, the effect of designing risk out is that it results in a total elimination of the risk from the project or system.